How long is an annotated bib

It differs from a straightforward bibliography in that each reference is followed by a paragraph length annotation, usually — words in length. Depending on the assignment, an annotated bibliography might have different purposes:. A descriptive or informative annotated bibliography describes or summarizes a source as does an abstract, it describes why the source is useful for researching a particular topic or question, its distinctive features.

In addition, it describes the author's main arguments and conclusions without evaluating what the author says or concludes. McKinnon, A. Lessons learned in year one of business. Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting , 30 4 , 26— This article describes some of the difficulties many nurses experience when transitioning from nursing to a legal nurse consulting business.

Pointing out issues of work-life balance, as well as the differences of working for someone else versus working for yourself, the author offers their personal experience as a learning tool. The process of becoming an entrepreneur is not often discussed in relation to nursing, and rarely delves into only the first year of starting a new business. Time management, maintaining an existing job, decision-making, and knowing yourself in order to market yourself are discussed with some detail.

The author goes on to describe how important both the nursing professional community will be to a new business, and the importance of mentorship as both the mentee and mentor in individual success that can be found through professional connections.

An analytical or critical annotation not only summarizes the material, it analyzes what is being said. It examines the strengths and weaknesses of what is presented as well as describing the applicability of the author's conclusions to the research being conducted. For most of your annotated bibliographies, however, you will be writing analytical or critical annotations.

This article describes some of the difficulty many nurses experience when transitioning from nursing to a nurse consulting business. Your annotations might stop at summarizing, or you could take it a step further by evaluating the source.

To do this, you want to compare and contrast it. Why did this one make the cut? Explain the overarching goal of the source and why it fits into your paper so well.

Additionally, you want to look at the reliability of the information and any bias it might have. Dig deep into your source like in this example. Wilson, John Philip. UNM Press, Through primary resources like original letters, song lyrics, and casualty lists, the author, a historian-archeologist, provides a fresh narrative of the Civil War.

The author dissects primary sources like witness testimony and original newspaper accounts to clearly understand the battles fought within the Civil War. It not only takes you through the major battles but the minor ones happening in the west to provide you a clear picture of the war. You can combine all three types of annotations into your annotated bibliography.

For example, you might spend a few lines describing and summarizing the work and end with an evaluation. Just like there are different types of annotations you can create, you can also use different writing styles. Annotations typically follow three specific formats depending on how long they are. All annotated bibliographies have a title, annotation, and citation. While the annotation is the same for all, the way you create your title and citation varies based on your style.

Get examples of an annotated bibliography in each different style. An APA annotated bibliography is used for science and technical papers. An MLA annotated bibliography is the go-to style of high school and college students for language arts and humanities papers.

This style uses MLA style citations and formatting like the surname and page number header. Chicago style annotated bibliographies are a catch-all type of style with author-date and notes-bibliography citations. The citation used in Chicago style can vary by style, but the annotation remains the same. When it comes to creating your annotated bibliography, you can use the annotated bibliography generator at Bibliography. Get a step-by-step overview on how to create an annotated bibliography using Bibliography.

Creating your annotated bibliography through Bibliography. The difference between an abstract, literature review, and annotated bibliography can get a bit fuzzy, especially if you are new to the academic writing game. You know an annotation is a brief synopsis of your source.

Explore how that differs from an abstract and a literature review. Like an annotated bibliography, literature reviews can be full papers, in their own right, or they can be incorporated into a school paper. The literature review also suggests ways to move the research forward or identifies gaps in the existing literature. Preparing a literature review helps students learn how to find and critically evaluate sources. The difference between an abstract and an annotated bibliography is abstracts are included as part of research papers.

When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. Below you will find sample annotations from annotated bibliographies, each with a different research project. Some annotations may address all three of these steps. Please keep in mind that all your text, including the write-up beneath the citation, must be indented so that the author's last name is the only text that is flush left.

Lamott, Anne. Anchor Books, Lamott's book offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott's book are wry and anecdotal and offer advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one's own internal critic.