Why does the epa hate america

Since , U. Our regulations should not stifle this innovation and progress. Redundant, top-down mandates from Washington do not work. Far too often, we have seen standards promulgated that are unattainable with even the best available technology, resulting in job losses and costly legal challenges.

These amendments not only follow the text and spirit of the Clean Air Act, but also reduce regulatory burden to the industry and streamline other requirements. FedEx is also one of the 20 biggest commercial users of solar energy, according to the Solar Electric Industries Association. In comments filed with the EPA, Google asked that the plan be strengthened.

Some companies have staked out a middle ground. The fact that so few companies are willing to push for coal-plant regulation frustrates some environmentalists. This article is more than 6 years old. The reluctance of so many companies to take a stand against climate change raises questions about the depth of corporate partnerships with NGOs.

But another conservative policy intellectual offers a theory: familiarity. How much does the average voter know about, say, the Securities and Exchange Commission? Not much.

But she might know that Dodd-Frank was a financial regulation bill passed by Democrats. EPA, on the other hand, is comparatively widely understood.

It was even where the villain works in Ghostbusters. It also plays a much more central role in environmental regulation than some other cabinet departments do on issues that are largely determined at the state and local level, such as transportation. It will be interesting to see on Thursday if Trump moderates his extreme anti-environmental stance as part of a pivot toward the general election. A poll commissioned by the American Lung Association found that a plurality of Americans have a positive view of EPA and that the agency is far more popular than oil companies or Congress.

Another poll released by the association last year found that 73 percent of voters support EPA imposing stricter limits on smog pollution from power plants and other industrial facilities. If Trump wants to win over swing voters, threatening to abolish EPA is probably not the way to do it. He did not. We aim to inspire more people to talk about climate change and to believe that meaningful change is not only possible but happening right now.

From here, negotiations for a new contract will begin within 90 days. This contract must shield our workforce from potential destructive political maneuvers by future administrations.

Our contract must support a workplace where the best and brightest are incentivized to make their careers at EPA, where scientific integrity, the rule of law, and a hate-free workplace are guaranteed.

Our contract must balance our work for the American people with our commitments to family and community.

We have already seen EPA workers leave due to unnecessary limits on work schedule flexibility and telework. If we are not able to change that, we will further lose seasoned staff and miss out on potential incoming talent to the private sector where they can find more flexibility and upward mobility. After the last 16 months, my colleagues and I have seen that we can continue our full commitment to our jobs and the mission of the EPA, but there is more to life than work.